Posted by: Ann Corcoran | September 18, 2012

Anti-Islam filmmaker big financial backer of our dear leader

Thanks to reader Henry for sending this brief (humorous?) story.  I bet that you think we are talking about THE filmmaker taken into police custody for questioning in the dark of night because Hillary and the girls insist that he is responsible for the death of our US Ambassador and the three other Americans in Libya on 9/11.

Nope!  It’s Bill Maher (FoO) who was offensive to the religion of peace and it went quite unnoticed!

From the Patriot Update:

Bill Maher made a comedy/documentary called “Religulous” that’s most famous for mercilessly mocking Christianity. But what people forget is that the last twenty-minutes or so of the film make a damning case against Islam.  [Here is Maher on his 2008 film.—ed]

Bill Maher made a film that mocked Islam.

Bill Maher also contributed $1 million to a pro-Obama super PAC.

And I’m sure that upon being reminded of this, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will tremble with self-righteous indignation and demand Maher take his money back.

After all, if movies create the terrorists who in turn create the terrorism, what about Bill Maher?

And, so what can we expect when the Hollywood blockbuster on KILLING BIN LADEN is released?  

Several talking heads speculated yesterday on what the fall-out in the Muslim world might be when that happens especially because we now know that the White House quietly helped filmmakers in order to portray Obama as the “gutsy” guy who effectively pulled the trigger.

Here is one story (of many) on the White House involvement with those filmmakers.

Newly released documents prove that Barack Obama’s administration gave enthusiastic help to the Oscar-winning team behind a new film about the killing of Osama bin Laden, according to a rightwing US government watchdog.

Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal’s new film Zero Dark Thirty centres on the US Navy Seal unit that raided Bin Laden’s compound in northern Pakistan in May 2011 on the orders of the US president. The project drew flak from Republicans earlier this year after it emerged that Obama’s administration shared information with the production team.

The latest missives were obtained by the Judicial Watch group under the US freedom of information act. “These new documents provide more backing to the serious charge that the Obama administration played fast and loose with national security information to help Hollywood filmmakers,” said Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton. “No wonder we’ve had to fight one year of stonewalling from the administration. These new documents show there is no doubt that Obama[‘s] White House was intensely interested in this film that was set to portray President Obama as ‘gutsy’.”

By the way, didn’t we hear that some Islamist demonstrators around the world were chanting:  “Obama, Obama, we are a billion Osamas!”

Film to be released in December?  Here is the trailer!  Watch it!

I sure hope, don’t you, that the Hollywood filmmakers and the actors and actresses have their personal security lined up.

Zero Dark Thirty is due out on 19 December, just after this year’s US presidential election. The timing is designed to allay fears among Republican politicians that the movie might influence voters by portraying Obama in a flattering light.

Watch for a change of plans.



  1. You know, I think I will wait to see this one at home. If you though the Dark Knight shooting was horrible, this debut is not going to go off well if the administration allows it to be shown. I expect the freedom of speech will be strangled before then.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: