Posted by: Ann Corcoran | March 27, 2012

Forbes yanks story on Obama the “Manchurian candidate”

Unfortunately I only have a few minutes to put this post up.  Don’t want to be late for my bus to the rally in DC today!

Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit and other bloggers noted that Forbes had posted an article recently and yanked it within hours.  Bloggers had already captured the story.  It is about a book entitled ‘Hope is not a strategy’ where the authors say the following:

“There is something very wrong when the sitting president refuses to divulge huge pieces of information about his background. What is he hiding? Maybe the “birthers” were a little extreme, but is there something wrong with this “manufactured candidate,” whose history remains sealed from public view? What is he hiding?

Could the “Hawaii birth certificate” be a forgery? Is there something much worse—like “sponsorship” by an unnamed special interest? I don’t know. I do know that the man in the White House now is an imposter. The only question is which kind of an imposter: an incompetent “pretender” or a genuine phony, a “Manchurian candidate,” who is a liberal, ½ black and ½ white, and an obvious Muslim sympathizer.

Will this campaign expose him as the imposter, and the pretender his behavior has revealed? Will it expose his hidden history and murky background. We know about his failures and mistakes.

Sounds like a book worth checking out—it should be available in a few days, according to press accounts.



  1. Let’s say Obama is a fraud and usurper – unqualified. What then? He can’t be impeached for several reasons. For example, his corrupt gang of self-interested traitors in congress will not cooperate with their votes. It’s the Clinton impeachment all over – sound and fury, without ultimate result. Not politically feasible.

    Also, if he is not qualified, he never was and is not “president” — so how can he be legally “removed”? In fact, all his actions are a nullity – and void. So, it seems that some type of legal action would be required in the courts. And, as a practical matter, getting evidence is very difficult at this level, because the big O has been very clever and thorough in hiding his record of the past. Now, anyone with half a brain knows why he spent millions right after assuming the office of president, to pay lawyers to bury every shread of paper possible about his past.

    In any case, legal cases take a long time, and judges will put the bar very high before they go out on a limb to convict or hold again someone at this level of public visibility. Of course, you can’t get the FBI to do an investigation, because good old Eric Holder is part of the stonewalling.

    I think, as a practical matter, we have to find the 10th amendment and “federalism” – so that states have to exclude the name “Obama” from the ballots. We have to reassert something that has been lost since the Civil War, which is a valid case for “state’s rights” (sans the “slavery” and “racial” overtones that clouded the issue at that time)

    No one is around today who lived through the civil war. But anyone who has studied history in an impersonal, objective manner, will recognize that “slavery” was only the hot button issue, the “trigger”, at the time that brought out the violence. In crushing out “slavery” by violence, a certain element of “federalism” was sacrificed, that we now have to reclaim as part of “checks and balances” – again, the 10th amendment.

    We have a modern version of the problem in the Trevhan Martin flair up — all sorts of racial inflamation, whereas the facts are something else altogether. It like burning the quran, and them people getting their heads cut off. Or, “honor killing” because a man doesn’t like the way a woman parts her hair. This is the accepted, yet highly uncivilized, level of human functioning that is common to many.

    We have to discuss these fundamental disconnects from reality, to set us on the right course to deal with the “Obama” fantasy-trip. It’s all part of the dynamics of insanity that is the toxic addiction of our times. The answer is first to SEE it – rather than dramatizing or judging. Let’s open our eyes, people…..anyone? Al Sharpton? Jesse Jackson? Steny Hoyer? anyone?….

  2. We know so little about Obama …. Could he have changed his name in Canada?

  3. Could he be a gay drug user?

    • Henry, I’ve seen the photo before—he is, I believe, Obama’s Muslim roommate with whom he traveled to Pakistan. But, you know, until now I didn’t look at it closely—heck they have a whole couch there they could put between them. I hope America is collectively shamed someday when they get it about who is in the White House—not the gay part as much as the commie part.

  4. Wow, you guys actually give credence to this conspiracy theorist crap? As a moderate I honestly don’t know what to do here. Loonies to the Left, Nutjobs to the Right…what is a moderate to do? Why don’t you consider voting on issues and supporting candidates that believe the same as you do about those issues instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater and crying to burn down the government? Crazies, all of you. Go back to your bunkers you wingnuts.

    • The eligibility of any candidate is a campaign issue (Romney should release his tax returns); and a constitutional issue in the case of ‘natural born.’ Because of that ‘natual born’ issue, McCain was (rightly) subjected to a senate hearing on his eligibility. Are you suggesting that we should treat Obama differently?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: