Posted by: Ann Corcoran | March 13, 2012

Pravda cares about the Obama birth certificate controversy

The American mainstream media might not have given even a few column inches or a few minutes TV coverage to Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s press conference in which his investigators allege the birth certificate Obama waved in the White House last spring is a forgery, but Pravda gives it a gazillion column inches.  (Hat tip: Judy)

Here American writer Dianna Cotter lays out her theory of collusion that went on beginning in the mid-2000’s to cover up Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility issues.   Unfortunately I don’t have the time to give you a full accounting of Ms. Cotter’s treatise, but please read the entire piece because she alleges some theories we haven’t heard in any great detail before.  Who knows what the truth will be, but you can be sure we don’t have the whole story on Obama yet.

By the way, you can also see one portion of her investigative work in which she says the legal research site—Justia.com—actually removed documents from its website relating to an 1875 Supreme Court ruling in Minor v. Happersett at American Thinker.

The evidence keeps piling up (see previous post about the illegal robocall) that the mainstream media is invested in re-electing Barack Obama and in keeping Dems in power.   Our job is to call them on it every chance we get.


Responses

  1. On Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, I believe Obama is eligible to be president. On Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays I’m convinced he’s a foreign usurper. On Sundays, I take a rest from thinking about it. That being said, the videos by Arpaio’s investigators claiming the documents themselves are forgeries are frighteningly convincing.

    The key question I struggle with — if Obama is indeed not a US citizen — is WHY was he still aggressively groomed and promoted by a large and powerful group of influential people? I know a little bit about corporate recruiting, and am 100% confident that any questions about Obama’s citizenship would have been uncovered if he were being considered for CEO of any Fortune 100 company. Therefore, there are only two explanations:

    1) His backers knew of his citizenship problem, but supported him in spite of it because they believed he was uniquely qualified to be president.

    2) His backers knew of his citizenship problem, and supported him because of it, for some nefarious purpose that we have yet to learn.

    I find both explanations equally implausible, although I admit that from time to time #2 does send a chill down my spine.

    • Very well said.

  2. The National Review cares too:

    http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/conspiracy-again-editors

    And so does the Economist:

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012

    These are considerably more reliable publications than Pravda.

  3. If you believe that Obama was born in Kenya, you will–in fact, must–believe the following story; http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/03/stanley-ann-dunham-obamas-day-off/

    • Very amusing story. But, actually I don’t believe Ann went to Kenya and gave birth, there is something else Obama is hiding—what? I don’t know, but hope we will find out before he does more damage to the Nation. Ellen if you are so sure of what you are suggesting, tell me why Ann left Hawaii (left the U.of Hawaii, her parents, and her new hubby and baby-daddy) a few weeks after Barack was born and enrolled in the U. of Washington (those records have been found) where she stayed until Barack Sr. had left Hawaii the following year for Harvard. 1961, 18 years old with an infant a few weeks old and she changes colleges for one year?

      Barack Sr. never did go see his baby after that (until Barack was 10 years old), shacked up with another white woman in Boston and was subsequently deported to Kenya before finishing his doctorate. So, why don’t we get the real story? What is on the real birth certificate?

      Why no college records—remember we saw Bush’s grades and Kerry’s grades a few years back. Was it because Barack was getting special treatment and student aide as an Indonesian student?

      Look forward to hearing your theory—esp. why Ann left hubby in Hawaii?

  4. Re: “and her new hubby and baby-daddy) a few weeks after Barack was born and enrolled in the U. of Washington (those records have been found) where she stayed until Barack Sr. had left Hawaii the following year for Harvard. 1961, 18 years old with an infant a few weeks old and she changes colleges for one year?”

    None of this is illegal or immoral or fattening. It does NOT affect Natural Born Citizen status.

    Re: “Why no college records?’

    Answer. Why should he show them? There is no law that says that a president or a presidential candidate should show grades, and guess what, not one of the Republican candidates for president have shown their grades. Bush’s grades were leaked by a source at Yale. Bush did not release them. Kerry’s grades were on file at the Navy. He did not release his grades either. However, if the Republican candidate shows his grades, then Obama is likely to do so too.

    Re: “What is on the real birth certificate?”

    Answer: Exactly the same facts as on the image of the birth certificate that Obama showed. In fact, Obama showed both the image of the birth certificate and the physical copy of it, which was passed around in the White House Press Room, and everyone there got a chance to hold it and examine it. One reporter even photographed it.

    Three Republican and several Democrat officials in Hawaii have confirmed the facts on Obama’s birth certificate, that they are exactly the same as on t he birth certificate they saw in the files. And, in case you bought into the birther myth that Abercrombie said that he could not find the birth certificate. He didn’t. Birther sites said that he did, but they did not quote him because they did not interview him or have access to a transcript. So, he actually DID NOT SAY that the birth certificate could not be found, and three Republican and at least one Democrat officials (and the clerk too, of course) all showed that the original birth certificate exists in the files. (The clerk who created the short-form birth certificate did so by reading the facts off of THE DOCUMENT IN THE FILE. That is how the short-form process works.)

    For the facts on Obama’s birth certificate to be any different from the facts that Obama published, at least four officials in Hawaii would have to be lying. Two of them, the Republicans, would have had to have lied about Obama’s birth certificate before the 2008 presidential election–that is when they issued the first of two confirmations.

    • Ellen, we will all just have to wait and see what the truth is when it finally comes out. I think Obama was born in the US, it’s something else he is lying about throughout the narrative he and Bill Ayers put out in ‘Dreams from my Father’—perhaps nothing illegal but it will just prove what a big fat lie his whole story is…

  5. Re: “we will all just have to wait and see what the truth is when it finally comes out.”

    The truth IS out. Obama was born in Hawaii, he could not have been born anywhere else,

    As for claims that the birth certificate said something other than what Obama has published (that maybe Malcolm X was his father), birthers are dreaming, having fantasies. And they insist that perhaps the Republican and Democrat officials in Hawaii are lying. Sure. Dream on.

    Re: “Bill Ayers put out in ‘Dreams from my Father’—”

    Another birther myth. Ayers has said that he wished he had written it, he would have earned the millions of dollars in royalties that Obama did earn.

    • Ellen, I have not said Obama was born anywhere other than in Hawaii. I’ll be looking for you when the whole story comes… and Bill Ayers did write Dreams (Obama can’t write that well, even Michelle admitted that)….

  6. Re: “Bill Ayers did write Dreams (Obama can’t write that well, even Michelle admitted that)…. ”

    Dream on. Show your evidence. Show that Michelle said what you claimed. Show any evidence at all that Ayers wrote the book.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: