US warned of impending embassy attacks; were we betrayed?

That is what headlines elsewhere in the world are screaming.

Meanwhile, as you’ve heard over and over again, Hillary is blaming the rampaging and carnage in North Africa on that silly video.  I guess she didn’t notice the attacks were on 9/11.  You might want to take a minute and search around to see some trailers for the so-called anti-Islam film.  By drawing attention to a goofy (and it is goofy) film she only further endangers Americans throughout the world.

Hillary Clinton’s reaction is more proof that her naivete about the threat posed by Islamists should be worrying to us all especially as she has turned a blind-eye to the possibility that she herself, in the US State Department, is compromised by those she has chosen to work by her side.  I’m speaking now of the controversy swirling around Huma Abedin, Clinton’s long time personal aide.

Incidentally, as far back as January 2011 when even Fox News was gushing breathlessly about the miracle of the  “Arab Spring” we told you it wasn’t what the media was portraying, but instead was a power grab by the Muslim Brotherhood.

Here is how the story in UK Independent begins (You should read those British papers because they aren’t shilling for Obama!):

The killings of the US ambassador to Libya and three of his staff were likely to have been the result of a serious and continuing security breach, The Independent can reveal.

American officials believe the attack was planned, but Chris Stevens had been back in the country only a short while and the details of his visit to Benghazi, where he and his staff died, were meant to be confidential.

The US administration is now facing a crisis in Libya. Sensitive documents have gone missing from the consulate in Benghazi and the supposedly secret location of the “safe house” in the city, where the staff had retreated, came under sustained mortar attack. Other such refuges across the country are no longer deemed “safe”.

Read it all.

About these ads